We could very well get hit by a large stellar object next week and never invent anything again.

EssayHelpForHire

What i thought is that energy is always produced when bonds are made and is used when bonds are broke. should it happens oppositely? And is there any other thypes of metabolism other than those two?” Granted the question was mostly about anabolism vs. catabolism, however the writer says and i quote, ‘…energy is always PRODUCED when bonds are made and is USED when bonds are broke(n).’ I thought it might be important to correct this mistake because I respect the First Law of Thermodynamics. Even integration of solar into standardised roofing materials is still lagging – and maybe it is that we are still at the steep point of that curve with respect to photovoltaics, and integration into built surfaces like roads is going to depend on how such tech turns out when it is mature, ie when that S-curve is flattening out and we (hopefully) know how to make them durable enough and cheap enough that including them in such surfaces adds little to overall costs. Even integration of solar into standardised roofing materials is still lagging – and maybe it is that we are still at the steep point of that curve with respect to photovoltaics, and integration into built surfaces like roads is going to depend on how such tech turns out when it is mature, ie when that S-curve is flattening out and we (hopefully) know how to make them durable enough and cheap enough that including them in such surfaces adds little to overall costs.

I suspect these tend invoke some outside agency when used in practice – God or Lady Luck, or just loaded dice or other cheating influencing the outcome)Or perhaps it has elements of the Fallacy of a Single Cause – false because it leaves out the complexities.Or maybe this kind of thinking doesn’t reduce down to a single fallacy and has elements of several.Innovation and technological advancements arise out of human behaviours – things like people spending time and effort trying to make them happen, and financiers choosing (or not) to support them in doing so, and referencing market assessments of the potential demand or popularity. Nuclear power would get too cheap to meter. While anabolism and catabolism are real, they are not truly distinct.

We can wait an eternity and still not expect FTL or artificial gravity or reverse time travel technology for example to arise as some kind of statistical outlier within technological development. It could be all of these things will eventually happen according to the law of averages. I was thinking some variant of “correlation is not proof of causation” – but that doesn’t quite fit.

I’ve encountered lots of people who do assume that technological advancement is unbounded and that a recent history of rapid advancement means further rapid advancement is inevitable and even, by it’s nature, accelerating, like it’s a natural law. thxx..that really helps =) Probably there is a named fallacy that applies but I don’t know it. It gets fuzzier the further we try to predict.Solar roads – well, they may represent the ultimate expression and possible end game for solar technology’s integration into man-made surfaces but there is nothing inevitable about them. Originally Posted by tridimity Energy is not produced or destroyed, although it can be transformed from one form to another (First Law of Thermodynamics) Tridimity This has nothing to do with answering the OP’s question. The flying car is hard to pilot and hasn’t caught on with the general public, possibly because of safety concerns.

Originally Posted by zinjanthropos I think it’s called a Slippery Slope fallacy, saying what’s going to happen in the future when no one can possibly know. ‘ I was thinking it could be an Inverse Gambler’s Fallacy – that a run of dice coming up six raises the likelihood that it will again. (Rather than the ordinary Gambler’s Fallacy, where a run of sixes means gamblers think it is less likely to come up again. And apart from physical constraints, there are economic and political ones also; supersonic air travel is well within what is physically possible other constraints have prevented it supplanting slower, but safer and less costly air transport.Whilst we remain partially ignorant of a full and true understanding of the physics of everything we leave room to imagine that when we do, it might have room for those things – but it will be the true nature of everything that determines it, not our imaginations or hopes. I’ve encountered lots of people who do assume that technological advancement is unbounded and that a recent history of rapid advancement means further rapid advancement is inevitable and even, by it’s nature, accelerating, like it’s a natural law.

Ah there we are. hmmmm…. seems something went wrong. So, a catabolic action may be driving one that is anabolical, and the net result could be either.However, the distinction is sometimes useful in trying to understand what is going on. We could very well get hit by a large stellar object next week and never invent anything again. We can wait an eternity and still not expect FTL or artificial gravity or reverse time travel technology for example to arise as some kind of statistical outlier within technological development. After all the further one tries to peer into the future the more likely one is going to be wrong.

I’m more of the view that advancements in knowledge and technology are not exponential but follow an S-curve. Yes, we can count on more advances, because we are still at such a point and there is a pipeline of backed up possibilities, some of which verge on inevitable certainty. And apart from physical constraints, there are economic and political ones also; supersonic air travel is well within what is physically possible other constraints have prevented it supplanting slower, but safer and less costly air transport.Whilst we remain partially ignorant of a full and true understanding of the physics of everything we leave room to imagine that when we do, it might have room for those things – but it will be the true nature of everything that determines it, not our imaginations or hopes. Planes kept getting faster so we should have expected the skies to be dominated by supersonic aircraft by now and sub-orbital flights just, so to speak, over the horizon.

It gets fuzzier the further we try to predict.Solar roads – well, they may represent the ultimate expression and possible end game for solar technology’s integration into man-made surfaces but there is nothing inevitable about them. The physical limitations on what can work and what can’t are intractable, whether we recognise it or not, but the social and economic limitations that operate within those greater limits, are more flexible and unpredictable. What doubt me is that why anabolism is powered by catabolism.

What doubt me is that why anabolism is powered by catabolism. They would be hard to write on a flat surface though as they could become extraordinarily complex. I’m sure if we just stop investing in roads they might catch on and the increased demand would produce better flying cars though.Perhaps I got ahead of myself though.

Planes kept getting faster so we should have expected the skies to be dominated by supersonic aircraft by now and sub-orbital flights just, so to speak, over the horizon. Being at the steep point on that curve looks very like exponential, but that will ultimately prove illusory. At least, not without the actual, true physics of everything including such possibilities. I’ve been working on something called “Destiny charts” that I’ll post just after this. I think it’s called a Slippery Slope fallacy, saying what’s going to happen in the future when no one can possibly know. ‘ Energy is not produced or destroyed, although it can be transformed from one form to another (First Law of Thermodynamics) Tridimity At least, not without the actual, true physics of everything including such possibilities.

Still, I suspect this kind of research is being conducted more by psychologists with jobs in advertising and PR, dedicated to influencing what we like and encouraging impulsive behaviours, than by those who work at improving human control over their impulsive and unproductive behaviours. Being at the steep point on that curve looks very like exponential, but that will ultimately prove illusory. I’m more of the view that advancements in knowledge and technology are not exponential but follow an S-curve. Originally Posted by Ken Fabos Is it a law of averages or bell curves of distribution – where unlikely things lurk in the tails? But no technology exists independent of physical reality – there are “laws” that cannot be circumvented, whether we are aware of them or not – and I think it is a finite exercise to reach a genuine understanding of the underlying physics of everything; we are closer to that than at any time in history.

It’s just a question of when they will happen. Moore’s Law predicting the future of microprocessor capabilities rather than being an observation about the past. Catabolism being the breaking down of a molecule, while anabolism is the building of larger molecules from smaller ones.

Human metabolism is intensely complex and very interactive. I’ll bump your thread though. I have no idea myself I just want to make my 5 posts so I can put up my loony signature. The catabolism is coupled with the formation of “high-energy” molecules like NADH or FADH2.Catabolism and anabolism are very broad categorizations. Related Discussions:Does anyone know how to speed up metabolic rate?Metabolisman easy question …?!Mitochondrial ResearchWhy do endomorphs have such a low metabolism rate?Contra evolution arguments?Immortality?

Is that possible?Weight loss via respiration ?Which one is least harmful in our life?atkinson and the fumblings of science YES it does – “From what i have read that there are two types of metabolism: anabolism and catabolism. Originally Posted by Ken Fabos I was thinking some variant of “correlation is not proof of causation” – but that doesn’t quite fit. It could be all of these things will eventually happen according to the law of averages. Like I said they won’t tell you when something will happen only if it will eventually happen. Moore’s Law predicting the future of microprocessor capabilities rather than being an observation about the past.

From what i have read that there are two types of metabolism: anabolism and catabolism. Is it a law of averages or bell curves of distribution – where unlikely things lurk in the tails? But no technology exists independent of physical reality – there are “laws” that cannot be circumvented, whether we are aware of them or not – and I think it is a finite exercise to reach a genuine understanding of the underlying physics of everything; we are closer to that than at any time in history. It could just end up like the flying cars we were predicted to have, we invented them but they aren’t very practical.

What i thought is that energy is always produced when bonds are made and is used when bonds are broke. should it happens oppositely? And is there any other thypes of metabolism other than those two?i essay papers buy
feel that this question is a bit stupid but im just curious about itthxx Nuclear power would get too cheap to meter. Yes, we can count on more advances, because we are still at such a point and there is a pipeline of backed up possibilities, some of which verge on inevitable certainty. Although I suspect that a lot of behavioural impulses will come to be better understood. Originally Posted by tridimity Granted the question was mostly about anabolism vs. catabolism, however the writer says and i quote, ‘…energy is always PRODUCED when bonds are made and is USED when bonds are broke(n).’ I thought it might be important to correct this mistake because I respect the First Law of Thermodynamics. There are many different catabolic and anabolic pathways, but that is the general divide.

Most of what he stated is theoretically possible. It is also something of an artificial distinction. Probably there is a named fallacy that applies but I don’t know it.

Previous
Discover Scholarship Essay Writers Capable 10Page Papers
Next
Secrets For RussiaBride – An Analysis

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsor Today

Contact Us!

Address: 1337 E 5th St, Bethlehem, PA 18015

Phone: (484) 893-1060

Send us a message on Facebook!

How can you support farmland preservation?

Like urban planning books? Join the Smart Growth Discussion Book Club

Do you have opinions about urbanism, smart growth and public policy that supports sustainability and equity? We gather regularly to discuss relevant community issues at the Coffee House Without Limits in Allentown! Come make friends, drink coffee and explore ideas that will improve our communities such as: zoning, gentrification, air quality and more.

1 (7)

Make friends, discuss civic activism, new urbanism, smart growth, making a difference, and anything on your mind about your neighborhood or regional growth. Come make your voice heard!

If you are reading a really interesting book and want to propose it for future discussions please contact us: smartgrowth@renewlv.org or call 484.893.1060.

The Coffee House Without Limits in Allentown!

Moving Ideas to Action

4th Annual Summit for Smart Growth and Sustainable Communities
"Our Towns, Our Farms, Our Future"

Our 4th Annual Summit for Smart Growth was a huge success! We focused on social entrepreneurship and how to make sustainability legal. Check out the coverage of our event by The Morning Call here

SoCap and Ben Price of CELDF.

Last year on December 9th, 2016, almost 200 community leaders and concerned citizens gathered at the Renaissance Hotel in Allentown for RenewLV's fourth annual Summit for Smart Growth and Sustainable Communities to discuss social entrepreneurship and how to make sustainability legal. We also held table discussions that covered topics such as strategies for land preservation, community revitalization and municipal cooperation.

At last year's Summit, we asked the questions:

•How do you balance what appears to be competing interests: Doing good and making money?

•How does overbearing local, state or federal laws prevent us from preserving quality of life and/or supporting smart growth?

•How do we achieve local self-determination without giving up some of the laudable goals of regulations intended to provide quality of life and prosperity for all?

A big thank-you to all of the Summit for Smart Growth sponsors who contributed to last year's discussion! You made this event possible!

Mountain View

Report Highlights Fiscal Benefits of Smart Growth Renew Lehigh Valley has often noted the benefits of smart growth development for municipalities, including cost savings. A new report by Smart Growth America details the benefits for municipalities realized through smart growth development. Read the full report here.

Watch the Envision Lehigh Valley Virtual Meeting

RenewLV and our partners at the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission, the City of Allentown, the City of Bethlehem, and the City of Easton held a one-of-a-kind virtual public meeting for Envision Lehigh Valley. 100 participants logged in through a live video feed, Facebook, Twitter, and live chat. Missed the meeting? View the full recording on YouTube here

ideal-essays